What does automation mean for our ongoing gender inequality?
Recent trends and the broader history of technological change indicate that automation will usher in major shifts in labor markets over the next decade, displacing millions of workers but also creating millions of new jobs that require new skills.
The McKinsey Global Institute, having documented these changes for several years, has produced a new report examining how automation might affect men and women differently.
A key conclusion of the study is that persistent gender disparities in the workplace, as documented in a previous MGI report, will make it more difficult for women than for men to adapt to the coming changes in labor demand, skill requirements, and employment locations.
Based on a sample of six mature and four emerging economies — accounting for around half of the world’s population and 60 percent of global GDP — MGI estimates that the share of women whose jobs will be displaced (20 percent) is slightly smaller than that of men (21 percent).
Gender differences in the patterns of displacement, however, will be significant.
Both routine physical and cognitive tasks are highly automatable.
Because men are more highly represented in routine physical occupations (such as machine operators), 40 percent of their overall job losses will fall into this category.
By contrast, 52 percent of female job losses will be in routine cognitive jobs (such as clerical work), owing to women’s higher representation in this area.
Even with automation, the overall demand for workers will increase alongside rising productivity.
Rising incomes, the growing demand for health care, childcare and elderly care in aging societies, and investments in infrastructure, energy, and technology will create new job opportunities. Given the sectoral and occupational distribution of these opportunities, women may be slightly better placed to take advantage of them.
Assuming that current gender occupational and sectoral patterns hold, women could have access to 20 percent more jobs than they do today, compared with 19 percent for men.
This slight advantage for women reflects the robust growth that is expected in sectors like health care, where women are well represented.
In fact, in many countries, women account for over 70 percent of health care and social-assistance workers, and this sector could comprise one-quarter of future job opportunities for women (manufacturing will account for a similar share of potential job gains for men).
In mature economies, health care is one of only two sectors in which job growth is likely to be strong, the other being professional and technical services, where women are underrepresented.
Depending on the pace of automation, 7-24 percent of women employed (between 40 million and 160 million worldwide) may need to switch occupations, compared with 8-28 percent of men.
In mature economies, more women than men work in lower-paid occupations.
In the coming years, demand for high-wage labor will likely grow, while demand for low- and middle-skill labor will contract. Middle-skill jobs, particularly those held by men, are the most vulnerable.
Finally, for both men and women in mature economies, net labor demand in existing occupations and sectors (new opportunities minus displacement) is expected to expand only for jobs requiring a college or advanced degree, although it will increase across all educational levels in emerging economies.
There will also be jobs created in occupations that do not yet exist, but — historically and in terms of the US — around 60 percent of these have been in male-dominated fields.
If women can take advantage of opportunities to move to new jobs, they will maintain or even increase their current share of employment; if they cannot, already large gender inequalities could get worse.
The good news is that women in both mature and emerging economies have made significant strides in closing educational gender gaps.
The bad news is that many women in emerging economies still work in subsistence agriculture, and thus have little education and limited skills with which to make the transition to new occupations.
In mature economies, women are generally graduating from college at rates equal to or higher than those of men; but whether women are equipping themselves with the skills that will be in demand is an open question.
An MGI study in 2018 found that in Europe and the United States, the average job in 2030 could require up to 55 percent more time using technical skills.
Yet this is one educational area where women still lag far behind men.
To fill the jobs of the future, men and women alike will need both the flexibility to move across jobs, sectors, occupations, and locales, as well as the technical skills and knowledge to work with automated systems and intelligent machines.
As such, women will face powerful structural and social constraints, including pervasive stereotypes that limit their opportunities for mobility and the acquisition of skills.
Many women bear the double burden of paid work and unpaid household labor, which reduces the time they have to train and seek new opportunities.
Women are also less mobile than men, owing to family responsibilities, safety concerns, legal barriers, and limitations on their access to digital technologies in many countries.
The role of business
Given these hurdles, a strong case can be made for investing in skills programs tailored to women.
Fortunately, there are already non-profits from Afghanistan to the US training women and girls to code and acquire related technical skills.
In China, the All-China Women’s Federation cooperates with private-sector companies such as Alibaba to provide training and networking for women, especially in the e-commerce and technology sectors.
Nonetheless, more creative interventions by businesses and governments will be needed to ensure that women are equipped for the jobs and opportunities of the future.
Without concerted action, the coming automation wave will reproduce today’s persistent gender inequalities, potentially leaving women even further behind.
Laura Tyson, a former chair of the US President’s Council of Economic Advisers, is a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, a senior adviser at the Rock Creek Group, and a senior external adviser to the McKinsey Global Institute. Mekala Krishnan is a senior fellow at the McKinsey Global Institute. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2019. www.project-syndicate.org. Shanghai Daily condensed this article.